What is the conflict between Juror 3 and 8?

What is the conflict between Juror 3 and 8?

Juror #3: In many ways, he is the opponent to the basically composed Juror #8. Juror #3 talks about the simplicity of the case and the obvious guilt of the defendant as soon as he enters the jury room. He loses his temper easily and flies off the handle when Juror #8 and other jurors disagree with his opinions.

Why is the relationship between Juror 3 and 8 important?

rational and compassionate man, their often tempestuous relationship pulls a resolution wherein the defendant is now acquitted, the 8th Juror succeeds in his crusade for justice and the 3rd Juror is able to finally face-up to his own inner demons – a victory for everyone that would not have been achieved otherwise.

What does Juror 3 yell at Juror 8 at the conclusion of the act?

#3 yells out to #8 “I’ll kill you.” Everyone realizes that he is just using it as an expression, just as the boy might have when he yelled at his father. The diagram that the jurors look at is called?

How does Juror 8 persuade the jurors?

He counts steps, sets up a makeshift scene, and gets another juror to time him walking the way the witness would have. This persuasive ability he has helps the other jurors to see the facts clearly and eventually change their votes. In the end, Juror 8’s calm, quiet demeanor leads the jurors to all vote not guilty.

What proposition does juror Eight make to the other jurors predict what will happen next?

What proposition does Juror 8 make on page 26? The Jury will make another vote and if everyone still votes guilty, they were bring a guilty vote in to the judge.

How did Juror 8 convince other jurors?

Finally, Juror #8 helps convince some of the last holdouts by showing them that the other key witness was almost certainly not wearing her glasses when she allegedly saw the boy kill his father. For most of the jurors, this is the final nail in the coffin, and the verdict eventually turns to Not Guilty.

What did Juror 8 prove about the knife?

One of the biggest pieces of evidence against the defendant is the uniqueness of the knife he apparently used to kill his father. But Juror #8 blows this theory out of the water by reaching into his pocket and pulling out the exact same knife, which he bought for six bucks at a nearby store.

How does Juror 3 discredit another juror?

juror 3 attempts to discredit another juror. how does he try to do that and why? he attempts this by calling juror9 a liar. he calls one juror one f the executioners and he calls the rest of them old ladies and then yells that he wants to execute the boy.

How was Juror 8 discredited the knife?

How did Juror 8 discredit the testimony about the knife being rare and unusual? He showed the other jurors a knife exactly like the one the defendant allegedly used that Juror 5 had purchased just days before at a shop near where the defendant lives.

Why does Juror 8 think the boy is not guilty?

In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether. He votes not guilty because he feels that the group should discuss a case with such serious consequences before deciding.

Why did Juror 8 change his vote?

What is Juror 3’s biggest problem during the deliberation?

But one of 3’s biggest problems is that he wants the deliberation over. Juror #8 says that the boys would never yell, “I’m going to kill you.” Juror #3 later attacks #8 because he’s irritated he’s keeping them there. Juror #3 yells in anger, “Let me go, I’ll kill him, I’ll kill him!.”

What does Juror 3 say to Juror 8?

Juror #3 yells in anger, “Let me go, I’ll kill him, I’ll kill him!. ” (at #8) To which, #8 says something like “you really didn’t mean that, did you? ” The Prosecution’s Case: At the beginning of the play, eleven of the jurors believe that the boy killed his father.

What is the importance of Juror 3 in 12 Angry Men?

In “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose a young mans life is held by twelve men with contrasing views. Eight in the jury room: Juror 8, Juror 3 and Juror 9. Juror 8 is important because he is smart, brave, and fair. Juror 3 was important because he was the antagonist, he was mean, and he was intolerant.

How does Juror 4 change his mind about the case?

In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8.